The battle over the proposed Marlow Film Studios is heating up, as the Planning Inspectorate begins reviewing Buckinghamshire Council’s rejection of plans for the multi-million-pound development. This decision comes amid rising demand for UK studio space and a growing debate about the use of green belt land. Advocates and opponents alike are making their cases, raising fundamental questions about the balance between supporting the booming film industry and preserving local ecosystems and community resources.

A Bold Vision for a Growing Industry

Marlow Film Studios, a project spearheaded by developer Dido Property Limited, promises to expand the UK’s film and television production capabilities. The proposed 168,718-square-meter facility would feature state-of-the-art soundstages, workshops, backlots, and production support infrastructure. Located on a former gravel quarry and landfill adjacent to the A404, the site offers proximity to London and Heathrow Airport, making it logistically appealing for international and domestic productions.

Advocates argue that the development would reinforce Buckinghamshire’s status as a hub for creative excellence. The region already boasts iconic facilities like Pinewood Studios, where much of the James Bond franchise was filmed, and has hosted major productions like Wicked starring Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo.

“The UK film and TV economy is thriving, with $4.23 billion spent on high-end production in 2023,” said Marlow Film Studios in a statement. “This project will create economic opportunities, local jobs, and partnerships with the Marlow and High Wycombe communities, particularly for young people.”

Prominent industry figures such as Andy Serkis and James Cameron have thrown their support behind the project. Serkis called it “a phenomenally well-thought-out idea” and emphasized the site’s potential for creative and technological advancements. Cameron noted that it could serve as a base for his company, Lightstorm3D, and a training hub for 3D technology.

Community Resistance and Environmental Concerns

Despite the promise of economic and industry benefits, the project has faced significant local opposition. Buckinghamshire Council rejected the proposal in May, citing the location’s green belt designation. Under UK planning law, any development on green belt land must demonstrate “very special circumstances” that outweigh environmental and community impacts.

Opponents, including the campaign group Save Marlow’s Greenbelt, argue that the proposed site is part of the Little Marlow Lakes Country Park, a vital green space that contributes to local biodiversity and residents’ physical and mental well-being.

“A huge studio, along with the associated traffic and noise, would cause irreparable environmental damage and disrupt the social fabric of the area,” the group stated.

Concerns also extend to infrastructure. Critics warn that the influx of commuter cars and production vehicles could overwhelm local roads, despite promises of transport upgrades and new bus routes.

A Divided Community

The local response has been deeply polarized. While the developers highlight partnerships with schools and community groups, a poll conducted by Little Marlow Parish Council found that 85% of respondents opposed the project. However, Marlow Film Studios CEO Robert Laycock dismissed the results, arguing that low turnout and selective framing exaggerated the opposition.

“Local young people already have access to over ten studios within a 30-minute drive,” said Save Marlow’s Greenbelt. “There’s no compelling reason to sacrifice our green belt for this project.”

The Bigger Picture

The debate comes at a time when the UK’s film and television industry is flourishing, driven by demand for high-quality streaming content. Industry analysts note that while the UK is increasingly attractive to international productions, studio space remains a bottleneck. Buckinghamshire, with its established industry infrastructure, is well-positioned to capitalize on this growth—if the community and government can align on how to proceed.

The Planning Inspectorate’s inquiry will delve into these issues, balancing the economic benefits with the potential environmental and social costs. The final decision rests with Angela Rayner, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, following the inquiry’s conclusion on February 24.

For supporters, Marlow Film Studios represents a chance to solidify Buckinghamshire’s place at the forefront of the global film industry. For opponents, it’s a test of the commitment to preserving green belt land and protecting local communities from overdevelopment.